Mythbusters

33 Crores or 33 Dieties

Hindu Polytheism and lesser known Pantheons

What is God ?

There are three schools of thoughts that explain Gods and the nature of their Godhood.

  1. Experimental outlook of Vaisesika
  2. Cosmological outlook of Sankhya
  3. Metaphysical outlook of Vedanta

While each one of those deserves a special attention this work will talk about Polytheism and Pantheons.

In short, the gods are but the representations of the causal energies from which each aspect of the subtle and the visible worlds is derived. Deities should therefore be thought of as transcendent powers. Each of these manifests itself in a particular aspect of the perceptible universe, or, if we start our investigation from the perceptible end, each deity appears as a subtle entity presiding over the functioning of one aspect of the universe

“By the action of the undifferentiated air, the different notes, known as do, etc., are produced through the several holes of the flute. So, also, arising from the undifferentiated supreme Self, many states of being appear to exist.”
(Vişnu Purana 2.14.32.)

Polytheism

Hindu mythology acknowledges all gods. Since all the energies at the origin of all the forms of manifestation are but aspects of the divine power, there can exist no object, no form of existence, which is not divine in its nature. Any name, any shape, that appeals to the worshiper can be taken as a representation or manifestation of divinity.

The gods mentioned In the Vedas form only a small part of the Hindu pantheon, which gradually incorporated, and still is ready to incorporate, all the conceptions of divinity, all the gods, of all the religious groups, all new “incarnations” or representations of the supranatural powers which pervade the universe.

Vedic Pantheon

Every Hindu scripture, no matter the period or type, holds Veda as the supreme authority. Thus, we shall look at the divinities of Vedic people. To understand Vedic deities we must understand the world they inhabited. It was the beginning of settled agricultural society from a nomadic one in an area covered with unpredictable forces of forests.

“This whole world, verily, is just food and the eater of food.” (Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad 1.4.6)

Naturally, these forces of nature were given divine authority and the chief protectors became main gods. Rigveda tells us about 33 of them.

“Gods who are eleven in heaven; who are eleven on earth; And who are eleven dwelling with glory in mid-air; may ye be pleased with this our sacrifice.” (Rigveda 1.139.11)

Every text divides the amount of Gods differently yet their number and representation remains the same. This list is by no means a final verdict on a heavily debatable topic and should require the rationality of readers.

Gods in Heaven

Gods in Earth / Gods of Principles

Aditi gave birth to 12 Adityas that is Sovereign Principles

Gods in-between/ Other Gods

Conclusion

While Rigveda talks about 33 gods ,the Brhad-aranyaka Upanishad talks about “three hundred three and three thousand three” gods totaling at 3306 and it is just one of the pantheon. Later Vedic and Puranic period also tries to define the number of Gods with “33 Kotis”. While the texts of these period probably meant it as a classification between different types of Gods. Later and in some ways even Modern Hinduism adjoins it with the number “33 crore”, it is a symbolic representation of inclusive nature in Hindu Polytheism. This boom in divine authorities comes from the Puranic Period with the formation of sects around various avatars and incarnations of The Trinity: Vishnu, Shiva and Brahma and another sect of Shakti. The Gods and Goddesses of those sects are still being worshipped today.

It would be wrong to see a change in religion or a deviation from the Vedic idea of divinity in what is merely a matter of fashion, It is a way of representing the Divine that suited a particular time or country, a particular set of habits, or a different conception of the universe. The gods are universal principles; they are all-pervading realities. The words or forms we use to represent them are mere approximations.